POSITIONS...................3
170) 169 positions in regard to each other T 3 G 37 T(170)169
4 B 3. Untenable positions such as this are the T 4 B 3 T(188)C 15
you join; of your respective positions in space; and of your T 18 G 14 T(680)507
 
 POSITIVE....................15
mere negation. It is a positive miscreation. While the miscreation is T 1 B 42c T(54)54
from the negative to the positive use of denial. Remember, we T 2 B 14 T(75)75
negative device; it results in positive miscreation. That is the way T 2 B 14 T(75)75
is, of course, on the positive approach. Mind-watching would have preventedT 3 A 15 T(123)122
ability which emphasizes ONLY the positive aspects of what is judged T 3 H 2 T(174)C 1
It perceives it as a POSITIVE ACT OF ASSAULT. This is T 5 G 8 T(256)C 83
negative terms. There is a positive interpretation of the crucifixion whichT 6 B 1 T(272)C 99
The second step is a positive affirmation of WHAT YOU WANT T 6 G 10 T(296)C 123
interpreting fear correctly, as a POSITIVE AFFIRMATION OF THE UNDERLYING BELIEFT 11 C 2 T(453)- 280
only that. It has no POSITIVE goal at all. T T 17 G 2 T(651)478
3. Without a clear-cut, positive goal, set at the outset T 17 G 3 T(651)478
is impossible. For holiness is POSITIVE, and the body is merely T 20 H 4 T(756)579
you. If terms which seem positive rather than negative occur to W 12 L 3 W(20)
which you ascribe to yourself, positive or negative, desirable or undesirableW 35 L 4 W(57)
in salvation. It is a positive assertion of your right to W 61 L 3 W(112)
 
 POSITIVELY..................5
will state the same idea POSITIVELY, he will see the POWER T 5 E 4 T(242)C 69
YOUR ego in you. State positively, he would see you through T 5 E 5 T(242)C 69
as capable of being used positively as it is of being T 7 H 2 T(330)C 157
the laws of God. Stated positively, the law requires you only T 7 H 2 T(330)C 157
todays idea slowly and positively at least twice an hour W 20 L 5 W(35)
 
 POSSESS.....................13
NOT to enter into, or possess, the Kingdom. In physical terms T 1 C 7 T(56)56
on thinking that people CAN possess you, if you believe that T 2 A 31 T(72)72
mind believes that it can possess another. Since this is considerably T 2 C 13 T(92)91
special. And whoever SEEMS to possess a special self is loved T 16 F 8 T(618)445
far broader than you now possess. T 17 G 2 T 17 G 1 T(651)478
him MORE than other men possess. It MUST be more. It T 29 I 8 T(1011)825
SEPARATE roles, each seeming to possess advantages you would not want T 31 B 2 T(1046)860
attributes which it does not possess, and crowd it with images W 13 L 3 W(22)
can this self you made possess, when it would contradict the W 93 L 5 W(180)
The world believes that to possess a thing it must be W 159 L 1 W(344)
doubt that you must first possess what you would give. It W 187 L 1 W(410)
giving will increase what you possess. W 187 L 2 W 187 L 1 W(410)
all his peace. And to possess them must he sacrifice his M 14 A 4 M(35)
 
 POSSESSED...................14
quotation re healing of devil possessed man, in which the sufferer T 1 B 28b T(17)17
mans mind can be possessed by illusions, but his Spirit T 1 B 28c T(17)17
empty shell. This CAN be possessed by evil. But the Atonement T 1 B 28c T(17)17
be contaminated. Possession versus being possessed is apt to be seen T 1 C 9 T(57)57
what the Bible means by possessed of the Holy Spirit. It T 1 C 18 T(59)59
One aspect of the possessionpossessed conflict can be raised to T 2 A 20 T(70)70
The underlying component of being possessed is retained in the persecution T 2 A 20 T(70)70
A 21. If being possessed is brought to ascendance, a T 2 A 21 T(70)70
is a sense of being possessed by demons, and unless there T 2 A 21 T(70)70
free by definition. It is possessed, or held back, by ITSELF T 2 B 9 T(74)74
like you. Not special, but possessed of everything, INCLUDING you. T 24 C 10 T(845)664
you have lost what you possessed. The truth maintains that giving W 187 L 1 W(410)
are gone before they are possessed, or even grasped. Yet this W 300 L 1 W(549)
long as any mind remains possessed of evil dreams the thought M 29 A 6 M(67)
 
 POSSESSES...................2
of the abilities man now possesses are only shadows of his T 3 F 1 T(152)151
that the abilities which man possesses are only shadows of his T 3 G 1 T(159)158
 
 POSSESSING..................2
where the whole concept of possessing, or entering is a key T 1 C 7 T(56)56
is attempted in connection with POSSESSING, it leads to the paranoid T 2 A 20 T(70)70
 
 POSSESSION..................34
the extent of its results. Possession is very closely related to T 1 B 30e T(18)18
Cacey sic was wrong about Possession, and he was also wrong T 1 B 30f T(18)18
T 1 B 30j. Possession really means Not under Christ-Control T 1 B 30j T(19)19
earth-bound thoughts. This IS Demon Possession. After all, Lucifer fell, butT 1 B 30j T(19)19
when he is afraid of Possession, he need only remember that T 1 B 30n T(20)20
potential, and diverting it into possession. This is much like the T 1 B 41aa T(49)49
about the real meaning of possession should be clarified. Your own T 1 C 6 T(56)56
C 7. Fear of possession is a perverted expression of T 1 C 7 T(56)56
T 1 C 9. Possession is a concept which has T 1 C 9 T(56)56
1. It (possession) can be associated with the T 1 C 9 T(57)57
particularly likely to be contaminated. Possession versus being possessed is aptT 1 C 9 T(57)57
rather similar misperceptual reference point, possession can also be associated withT 1 C 9 T(57)57
an underlying fear of associating possession with people. In this sense T 1 C 9 T(57)57
of or desire for spirit possession. The term spirit is profoundly T 1 C 14 T(58)58
but have contaminated it with possession fallacies. The fear engendered by T 1 C 18 T(60)60
misinterpreted as a means of possession. Here, the content is not T 1 C 20 T(60)60
readily enough, in terms of possession fallacies (particularly penetration), and rejectionT 2 A 7 T(64)64
of them were subsumed under possession fallacies. The denial mechanism forT 2 A 15 T(68)68
One aspect of the possessionpossessed conflict can be raised T 2 A 20 T(70)70
state of some sort of possession by external forces results, but T 2 A 21 T(70)70
the possession-fallacy is to redefine possession correctly. In the sense ofT 2 A 29 T(71)71
closely related to the whole possession issue. You insist on thinking T 2 A 31 T(72)72
a LITTLE scared, and the possession idea came in for a T 2 B 54 T(83) 83
they do not entail the possession fallacy which DOES enter when T 2 C 13 T(92)91
ones mind (re sex, possession, etc.) you should immediately recognize T 3 E 1 T(147)146
with God, battling Him for possession of Souls. He deceives by T 3 I 4 T(181)C 8
If you share a physical possession, you DO divide its ownership T 5 B 3 T(234) C 61
which are fighting for its possession. In this perceived constellation, theT 8 H 3 T(370)C 197
HAVE things for salvation, for possession is its law. Possession for T 12 G 9 T(507)334
for possession is its law. Possession for its OWN sake is T 12 G 9 T(507)334
should be yours; your JUSTIFIED possession, and attack for what has T 23 C 10 T(828)647
your own. Never is your possession made complete. And never will T 23 C 13 T(829)648
have it in your own possession. Here the laws of Heaven W 159 L 1 W(344)
the patients most cherished possession; his picture of himself. And P 3 E 9 P(11)
 
 POSSESSION-DRIVE............1
to escape from the real possession-drive, which cannot be satisfied this T 1 C 10 T(57)57
 
 POSSESSION-FALLACY..........2
to others. This is a possession-fallacy. b. The idea that knowledge T 1 C 21 T(60)60
for ALL types of the possession-fallacy is to redefine possession correctlyT 2 A 29 T(71)71
 
 POSSESSION-IMPULSES.........1
confusion of sex impulses with possession-impulses. Some of the original materialT 1 B 41aa T(49)49
 
 POSSESSIONS.................1
- in other people, in possessions, in various situations and events W 70 L 6 W(132)
 
 POSSESSIVENESS..............3
Endowing the Spirit with human possessiveness is a more INCLUSIVE error T 1 C 15 T(59)59
strange compromise involving BOTH insatiable possessiveness and insatiable throwing-away (bankruptcy) mayT 1 C 25 T(61)61
strange compromise involving BOTH insatiable possessiveness and insatiable throwing-away (bankruptcy) mayT 2 A 16 T(69)69